Meiqi Guo vs Qianhui Tang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jul at 08:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Guo vs Q. Tang

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Guo 1 - 0 Tang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Meiqi Guo winning 2 and Qianhui Tang winning 0. The last match between Meiqi Guo and Qianhui Tang was at the W15 Luan, 24-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Meiqi Guo getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guo | 1 |
| Tang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Luan(07-24-25)
M. Guo vs Q. Tang H2H Profile
M. Guo vs Q. Tang Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance shape expectations? Guo has a stronger recent form with 43.04% of second serve points won compared to Tang's 37.38%.
- Who's dominating the return game recently? Tang edges out with 53.13% of second serve points returned successfully versus Guo's 46.73%.
- Are there differences in first serve returns? Indeed, Tang outperforms with 39.84%, while Guo stands at 34.67%.
- Handling high-pressure points, how do they compare? Guo has saved 49.48% of breakpoints, outshining Tang's 43.84%.
- Considering match outcomes over the past year, Guo has secured wins 59.15% of the time, leading Tang's 47.62%.
- Which surface suits each player best? Guo excels on I.hard with a 73% win rate, whereas Tang performs best on Hard with a 52% win rate.
- Do they confront opponents of similar levels? Guo's competitors average at a rank of 514.21, akin to Tang's opponent pool with an average rank of 501.19.
- In deciding sets, Guo's winning edge is notable at 53%, compared to Tang's 44%.
- Is breakpoint conversion a critical stat? Tang converts 45.31% of opportunities, outperforming Guo who converts at 36.09%.
Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance patterns, Guo and Tang present interesting contrasts in their game's nuances. Guo, with a superior second serve and effective pressure management, positions themselves as a formidable competitor. Conversely, Tang demonstrates strength in return games, posing challenges to Guo's service advantage.
Surface preferences might play a role, where Guo excels on I.hard, yet she is pitted against Tang's capable play on hard courts. Statistically, Guo has shown resilience in high-pressure scenarios and commands a stronger overall win record over the past year.
Although Tang may disrupt with a powerful service return and efficient break point conversions, Guo's balanced competencies suggest an edge. Factoring in all elements, including performance under pressure and overall consistency, Guo emerges as the likely victor for this upcoming match.
Meiqi Guo vs Qianhui Tang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Guo vs Q. Tang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:52:45 | Average Match Time | 1:52:45 |
| 62% (37/60) | 1st Serve % | 66% (38/58) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (17/38) |
| 57% (13/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 60% (35/58) | Return Points Win % | 37% (22/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Guo Recent Matches Played
Q. Tang Recent Matches Played

M. Guo vs Q. Tang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.97% (184/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.13% (85/88) |
| 57.41% (399/296) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.50% (202/198) |
| 53.21% (3330/2928) | Games Win/Loss | 51.62% (1877/1759) |
| 55.91% (123/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.77% (66/64) |
| 64.52% (40/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 70.00% (21/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 520 | Aces Total | 196 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 730 | Total Double Faults | 329 |
| 1:25:38 | Average Match Time | 1:10:33 |
| 517.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.24 |
| 60% (10715/17745) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5056/7976) |
| 62% (6637/10715) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2981/5056) |
| 47% (3336/7031) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1258/2920) |
| 48% (1054/2196) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (487/1042) |
| 46% (7943/17401) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3769/8143) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 50.00% (73/73) | Challenger W/L | 48.28% (56/60) |
| 68.52% (111/51) | Futures W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 58% (176/301) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (84/169) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 57% (31/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 55% (41/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 88% (186/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (93/73) |
| 11% (186/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (93/20) |
| 17% (126/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (80/12) |